Media in Court Cases

Media in salute movements has many effects. One of which is the possibility that the Medias opinion may solving in tainting the jury with unproven facts. As humans we make stopping points ground on how we perceive the world and the information we have on decision we are going to make. Pre-Trial Publicity Due to extensive media coverage, jury excerption in a high profile result can be extremely difficult. Jurors will likely have developed some biases almost the case based on the media coverage to which they have been exposed( Media operate In Capital Cases,2011).Under the 6th amendment you have the right to a bazaar trial by an impartial jury of your peers. That becomes extremely difficult and perhaps impossibly when the media open a flood gate of facts and opinions in the first place the case has even begun. In some instances they have to relocate to court case to an area where the media coverage of the case has not been so rampant on the thoton too find impartial juror s. Which just increase the cost of the court case. Not only can media influence the opinion of the jury but also the public.During the Casey Anthony case the media had a barrage of legal professionals condemning this women before the final verdict was concluded. TIME magazine called it The Social Media Trial of the light speed (Varma,2011). No matter what the outcome of the case that person will never have a normal life. According to datafromNMIncite,64percentofpeopleonTwitterdisagreedwiththenotguiltyverdict, piece of musiconly1% agreed (35% were neutral)( Varma,2011).Because of media allowed in courts this woman is considered guilty by 64% of people, even though she was found not guilty. References Media Influence in Capital Cases. (2011). Retrieved from http//www. capitalpunishmentincontext. org/issues/media Varma, A. (2011). Twitter Only 1% Think Casey Anthony Innocent. Retrieved from http//www. socialnomics. net/2011/07/08/twitter-only-1-think-casey-anthony-innocent/