Business And Government Agencies :: essays research papers

Business and Government Agencies     The primary focus of my affair is three fold, first if a high rankingofficial from a firm were to become the conductor of an agency and his formercomp whatsoever is inquire for favorable reception of a drug, how should the conductor act in regardto this rulemaking? The mo question is not a difficult, if a former Directorwere to pack a position at a firm asking for approval of a drug, how shouldthe former theater directors position influence the decisions of the agency? Finally howcould organisation regulation restore the potential conflicts of interest from the"Revolving Door"?     The first scenario adjudicate is both ethics and law based. It would beunethical for the Director to hasten any influence what so ever in this mount. Realistically the Director would have probably at least aninfluence to the degree that those who twist for him would at least try and guesshis desire for the outc ome, at mop he would directly or indirectly tell them.Probably at this point no procedural rules have been breached. This is of course that if the director has not tried to influence the Administrative Law Judge inwhich drive many legal issues could be raised, more on that in question three.Back to the ethics involved, it would be very important if the Director were totry and be ethical about the issue he/she should experience the appearance of ethicalprocedure. One way this could be done is that a recommendation could be maderulemaking be in a nut format. In addition she/he should be very careful tolimit ex parte contacts between himself and his former business associates.Under no thoughtfulness should the Director have conversation of any natureinvolving this case. Under the incident that the drug was or was notapproved, the case could go before discriminative review, there any appearance ofunethical behavior could not only be be evidence to support a plaintiffs claims,and even case a de novo review, but even worst it could be food for the mediaand a public scandal.     The second question if the director were to leave and become a superiorfor a firm. I dont see this as a tolerant threat, the new director would have hisnew alliances. It would seem like any influence that the former director wouldhave would have to be unbroken to a minimum in order to preserve the rulemakingunder the circumstance that the findings were on the firms behalf. As a companyrepresentative he should not personally make ex parte contacts with the agency