A Debate on Political Philosophy: Hamilton Versus Jefferson Essay

In the late 1700s to the beforehand(predicate) 1800s, the United States was in indispensability of a political ism that interpreted the Constitution loosely, avoided possibly ruinous wars, and built up the frugality in the easiest and most efficient office possible, all which were found best in Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton believed that the time called for a loose interpretation, or construction, of the Constitution. He and his Federalist followers invoked the idea of elastic article, a agency in which the people could bend exactly what the open Fathers were saying to help make it apply to the problems of the time.See much introduction Binding In China essayThe nation and her Constitution were cool it young and gro captivateg, and the ability to form the governing body as the country progressed was crucial to having any national stand upth at all. Jefferson, on the other hand, believed in a strict construction of the Constitution and the rights of individual states, no t federal official unity like Hamilton did. Unfortunately, it was clear to many that the rights of individual states, similar to the states rights that they had experient under the Articles of Confederation, were not reservation the nation operoseer, however instead get each state into more trouble, politically and economically.Foreign affairs likewise impacted why Hamiltons Federalist philosophy worked for the time. As the United States was but coming expose of a war, we were weak militarily, economically, and politically. The last thing that we call for was to enter into the French Revolutionary War that held enormous stakes. The Jeffersonians, however, favored observance the 1778 French-the Statesn Alliance that we had made, in order to repay them for helping us win our freedom, even though the French had never officially called on America to honor the alliance.George Washington, sensing that war would be too much for much(prenominal) a fragile nation, issued the 1793 Neutrality Proclamation warning Americans not to be partial to either side, so America would be better protected. Hamiltons economic policies and financial system was also the most effective way to build the new economy up. Hamiltons policies were shaped to favor the tight, but in such a way that the wealthy would lend the government money and give it political advocate, which would then cause the federal authorities to strive, higher course of actiones to fatten and grow with new wealth, and prosperity to filter to the masses.Hamilton believed in forming a national credit out of all the states debts, as swell as creating a Bank of the United States to have the government support itself in stock. Jefferson believed, contrary to Hamiltons more urban views of economic progress, that country-bred and private farming would be the fairest way to build up the economy from the bottom classes up. However, this would have been a very time consuming surgery and was therefore not suit ed for the infant America, who needed to grow apace to find its place in the rest of the world.Jefferson also thought a Bank of the United States was unconstitutional and forbidden by the Founding Fathers operating instructions in the Constitution. However, Hamilton proved that the Constitution permitted it by showing how the Constitution stipulates that intercourse may pass any laws necessary and proper to carry out the powers vested in the various government agencies, including the powers to collect taxes and regulate trade, therefore making a communal bank for the nation ideal and very good to structure and supporting an economy.In todays American, however, Jeffersons philosophy would be much better suited. Today, it seems as though we have roughly lost track of what the Founding Fathers wanted for this country, so going bear to a stricter construction of the Constitution would stop many of the questionable laws passed thank to an overly bendable elastic clause.Also, since the United States has been caught up in meddling in so many other nations political affairs as of late, we need to be reminded of honoring our alliances and keeping an open mind when dealing with other countries that argon in a current struggle. Now that we are an experienced nation in how to achieve and maintain independence, we are pie-eyed enough to help other countries do the same, although we would not have been in 1789 for the French Revolution.Finally, todays America has a very strong and stubborn upper class that, much of the time, promises to allow profit to trickle through to the extremely large middle class but does not follow through with those plans. Since it is too hard to work with the upper class to give prosperity to the lower classes, using Jeffersons philosophy of building up from the bottom, though it make take a while, will eventually work and make the American more equal.Overall, Hamiltons ideas of a more loose construction of the Constitution, caution when it came to extraneous affairs, and working through the wealthy to give prosperity to all Americans were well suited to the late 1700s and early 1800s. However, now that times are different, Jeffersons ideas are more applicable to our countrys needs of a more regulated government, more positive foreign affairs and well thought out foreign policies, and an equal economy that starts with helping the lower and middle classes to expand and grow in their own way.